Virginia Postrel in the
NY Times this week reports on the dynamics of personal resolutions by this year's economic science Nobel prize co-winner, Thomas Schelling.
Aside from the algorithmic models of personal decision sciences, he raises the question about the relationship between the "self" who makes a resolution and the "self" who is supposed to deliver faithful compliance to the first self's mandate.
Whether we're talking about resolutions of initiating new behaviors like working out or extinguishing old behaviors like food indulgences, there is a curious "third self" whose job is to think of clever ways to resolve conflicts between the first and second selves.
The third self employs all kinds of logic, rewards, and punishments to get compliance of the second self to the first self's supposed "good" intentions.
I would think that the whole matter requires a fourth (higher) self who looks at the whole drama and says, my only intention is to be unapologetically who I am. It is the resolution to favor authenticity over manipulation.